Recent Posts

Wednesday, November 24, 2010

A.I Convention

FOLLOWING IS JUST AN EDITED TEXT THAT CONVEYS MY IDEA ON A.I CONVENTION
I AM FOCUSING MORE ON Y THE CONVENTION IS NEEDED THAN COMPLEX FORMS OF A.I. AND ALSO
MORE THAN THE POINT OF COMMERCIAL PURPOSE.

i am thinkin if we ever created convention for AI for a specific FPS game.... wat that wud do is give other hobbyists and other game companies to launch thier own AI for several games that are only that specific FPS game. btw the specific FPS game i have in mind is like bots n ur own team face against another bots in ur opponent's team or as simple like halo 3's enemy AI. u can say its more like a mod for AIs. now there's a need to make a a certain but common access to the controls of the behaviour of any character to allow integration of any external AI. For ex: brutes in halo3 are capable of melling, aggersive attack, shooting and dodging and so forth... all of these actions r accessible to AI. BUTTT controls of navigation requires certain access to geometry of level and AI word position...now that's where one of the critical part of convention needs to made and will also truely test one's developed AI in that area. It will cheating if u tell the AI its position and other navigation data Then again all of the above r just one of many reasons for y convention is needed.

In terms of marketting purposes, u can imagine giving ppl freedom to integerate AI in halo 3...it will be fun to face against AI that has more intelligent moves as in wen to launch grandes or rocket or mellee than jus to fire weapons with 100% accuracy. advatnage to game companies r it will obviously increase shelf life for any game.

Now where we are truly gonna benefit with this A.I convention is to have a multiplayer game where all players command a team of lets say 4 AI players, and the objective is attack an defend of a city using tanks, artillery ...all modern weapons. Everyone wud wanna have thier own customized AI and wud obviously wanna have better AI that is flexible enuf to trick players by its moves rather than shooting with accuracy...now if u still think firing weapon accurate is all u need then...wati if i make the bullets bend and have delay in reach target as in real life...then the AI needs to either pre-plan where to fire and especially true challange is to outflank the player. Because of this dynamic feature the AI has to deal in that game, ppl wud wanna either wanna create or buy AI modules

if all of this is a sucess in real life then ur gona have a whole new genre of FPS where companies wud make games whose AIs are customizable

Sunday, July 18, 2010

Dealing with influences of limited ones on you

FOLLOWING is a convo with my cousin. Just a reminder for me in future that this question needs to be answered since loved ones are involved. And definitely to satisfy my curious mind, i must find the answer.

my cousin: y do ppl u love r d ones u cant be wit ?
n u have to put up wit all d oder idiots

me: recently been with ppl who r so condifent they understand stuff but u tell begin
to explain them they r like u know wat buddy ur far off from our topic so keep
opinion to urself.

my cousin :ouch


me: only way that i think is to be consistent with them but there's still a boundary
that won't budge so now u wonder wat value does thier existence hold why is that
they still serve a purpose more than them giving us a push of the experience
y is it that thier influence we hope to keep up inspite of us disliking it
stupid love...maybe
so u tell me

my cousin :lolz u answered ur qs

me: and u will get ur ans of "u answer that y do ppl u love r d ones u cant be wit ?
n u have to put up wit all d oder idiots"
i am not convinced that its love
maybe we r still too weak to seek thier support once we stand and call us to be
significant maybe we won't care anymore about them dirty fools
with thier insignificant brains.

Sunday, January 24, 2010

PREFACE:
A Response from a Youtube user
Person A: No,Science is a matter of opinion
Person B: you are a moron! science is based in fact not opinion. math is a science... is it fact or opinion that 1+1=2??
you are an idiot. is it an opinion that makes your computer work??? is it just your opinion that makes rocket science work??? you are a complete moron!! go back to church!


My response:
He probably means science is a matter of perspective, u look at data from any point of reference that may be infinite and solve patterns only to temporarily conclude that the very pattern can modeled more precisely than other perspectives and so forth in pursuit to see through perspective of the ORIGIN that in the end through all perspectives different aspects of the same is viewed.
THUS, i can be said it begins with a matter of opinion and even to predict a theory can be said a matter of opinion unless proven otherwise. I mean lets face it all particle physics theories r still waiting for HD collider to prove them

Wednesday, January 20, 2010

Mindless Convo about Good and Evil

PREFACE: Just a convo with a friend regarding a game with with a story line of a third side keeping balance between the factions of GOOD and EVIL. Turns out to be mindless and maddening discussion!

but still story of dark and good side with someone and then third side who seems more powerful than them sounds lame and the sensless part is isn;t god supposed to be on the good side?

PERSON: wtf u talking about
god created all he loves all
everhitnb is his
so he doesnt choose side man
infront of him there is no good or evil
something most ppl foreget to identify

intensenex: haha BS god loves his creatures but doesn't love evil, evil is more like an idea , a perspective

PERSON: lol dude how do u kna wat is evil
god created all he loves all
everhitnb is his

intensenex: anything that opposes god
rhs.bdz: plus when did i say he loves evil
read my sentesnces carefully i dont werite wrong
excpet werite was wrong lol
write**

Sent at 11:47 AM on Monday
intensenex: "infront of him there is no good or evil" that statement simply concludes that god doesn't stand for good cuz if god doesn't believe in evil or good then good and evil r jus nature of life which then is always wrong cuz then there will be no peace and if u speak of existence of peace between evil and good then it stil doesn't make sense cuz evil is also the absence of peace that we al know
counter that

PERSON: lol counter is u dont kna wtf u talking about
now u remidned me of wat u did in discreet

intensenex: tell me where i am wrong

PERSON: u keep on chewein on the same sentence with out a purpose
man now u remind me of da digital proof
only diffence she teaches us stuff
i am out
u deal wiht ur god

intensenex: is it because u don't understand my sentence or u cudn't chew up chains of logic or even with my logic making complete sense u jus cannot comprehend my intelligence thus concluding wat i said as my irrational belief

Wednesday, September 30, 2009

The reality we precieve is what to choose to decide

Just a few postings on my discreet forum that made me come up with my title phrase (4th para).

-------anonymous---------
So i stumbled upon this watching space channel at the gym. This one is for you carsy!
http:// some disturbing vedio about demon possession of body

P.S. my roommate has experienced this around 20 times, he has to take medicine for migraines and it apparently makes him more susceptible to another dimension....
---------my reply---------
Mr anonymous , topics like these are not relevant to this course and don't bother coming up ideas that you can use logic taught in discreet to explain the existence of these paranormal nonsense. I don't intend to be rude but for your own well being and safety (don't interpret as a threat from me) do not dwell your curiosity in these topics. AND please don't get others involved by posting videos and other material regarding paranormal stuff. I strictly hate the possibility of these material coming into circulation and students exchanging or viewing these materials during lecture or tutorial. Its not only distracting but VERY DISTURBING to ppl such as me. So again, please stop posting this for the sake of others and yourself or else I WILL TO PROF to remove these kind of posts bringing charging complaints of its irrelevance and disturbing factors.
-------anonymous---------

This post sparked from the comment about unicorns not existing in the textbook. Dr. Carswell is also interested in such metaphysical ideas, as we have often discussed them after lecture. The video contains studies done by academics in acclaimed universities such as Waterloo. The reality we perceive is a manifestation of our thoughts, therefore if you don't believe in any higher dimensions, and haven't taken any hallucinogens then you won't be able to see anything unusual.

--------my reply------------

haha i was expecting someone wud bring up that point. To that i am jus gonna say if he was so interested in showing us he wud have posted it himself which wud probably not contain those disturbing scenes or in the least he wud give his audience some warning about the content.

And lol i don;t think u gave enough thought on such a common idea "The reality we perceive is a manifestation of our thoughts, therefore if you don't believe in any higher dimensions, and haven't taken any hallucinogens then you won't be able to see anything unusual."

Not only its very controversial to a lotta folks. Our thoughts(, to be precise of all intelligent and few smart ppl ) even though grasped by our feelings are held in doubt, not just because it doesn't categorize to answer wat commonly seems related, but definitely the fact of how is it defined or wat defines it.Thus our thoughts are based on series or, to some extent , generations of analysis which validates the reason that infact "the reality we precieve is what to choose to decide". It jus plainly contradicting your point. And wat we choose to decide is based on our quest for truth not our inability to unaccepted the truth. Now like i said before it depends on ppl and by writing this whole damn thing you can judge wat place i fall into. Lastly, again if { p= i can make a valid point } then { q= i am right about your incorrectness of posting the video } P->q =(tautology)= q->p

Sunday, April 19, 2009

Personal MORALITY should not EXIST!!

Morality is set of rules to determine RIGHT or WRONG. But if morality is called to be a personal determination of right or wrong then => everyone group or individual has their own rules to determine righteousness or even define righteousness. However, upon given a situation to each group or individual to discuss the validity of actions involved, a controversial scenario will now begin to take form. Considering that all the groups are bound to have minimum a pair of conflicting right and wrong i.e between two groups or individual will say right while the other one will call it wrong atleast once, then on following the universal aspect of Right or Righteousness => (i.e) it can either be right or wrong, this totally contradicts the very occurrence of RIGHT or RIGHTEOUSNESS and also Law of excluded middle. THEREFORE, there has to exist a Universal Morality and existence of personal morals should be out of question.

Now, everyone uses their basic Morality “laws or points” to develop a new “law or point” when they encounter a controversial matter to judge its righteousness. In simple terms, they use their existing moral views to create new moral view. My question is, what universal and fundamental moral “law or point” should we adopt?

Should we use our so called common sense which infact is still moderately diverse? Or should we simply use deductive reasoning and introspection to find the answer? The problem to all of these methods is, On What Grounds Do We Stand On?

That is why I again stress on those people who create and develop their own morality “solely from their experiences” to seriously question on what they are doing.

Friday, April 17, 2009

Immature and Inconsiderate Admins

NOTE: This was my post to eGO clan admins for the various concern regarding their idiotic, unreasonable and misunderstood reasons for banning me off their server. My post is very clear and contains some questionable ethics on the principles and intent of "immature" (read on to find out proper meaning of immature) admins.


Aiight, i jus wanna start by being honest for my own sake and for making my intentions clear. I recently GOT BANNED from server 208.43.76.155:27015 24/7=EGO=Dust 2 server for abusing and i am not even sure who. (lol i did taunt admin 2 times but then i stopped but that's irrelevant since it was 15 mins before i got a message saying " i got bans and Bans r permanent"). All i said was stop whining to someone and someone out of the blue jus said Ban me. SO ya my primary request is to UNBAN me plzzzz smile.gif

my steam name is Nex X steamid= Steam_0:1:23923240

well, having my excuse briefly conveyed, i want to to use that as a scenario to support an EVER GROWING ISSUE (from my logical perspective) that is the most concerning and frustrating to players who are not subjected to definitive rules and finally that often results in violation of rules that is ALL OF A SUDDEN MADE BY ADMINS.

And throughout my 6/7 experience in ur server i have always noted above point to be true to only ADMINS who have a young (as in mostly kids), nerdy voice. Now i am not gonna label ppl who even posses that kinda voice but i am primarily directing at IMMATURE ADMINS. Now plz don't get the definition "IMMATURE" wrong. It mostly means people who are in a phase of inability to understand and have inadequate knowledge to understand. I am srry but it really jus PISSES ME OFF wen u have them with few or without warnings kick u. And also the consequence is, having a player kicked or banned(i had my friend banned) for repeatedly reporting on MIC for enemies and sometimes having them express their non-abusive opinions.

NOW IS THAT FAIR?????

i say NO and i sure the points in favor of unrighteous will always weigh more than needlessly complex and uncertain points that don't.


On contrary, i have seen some amazing admins, who barely kick u or don't kick at all but consistently warn them. They r friendlier than the player beside u smile.gif But gettin back to my point, this shows the abusive yet ignorant and arrogant use of Admin privilege. And wat exactly happened in my case is some kid admin's friend got unreasonably frustrated by me and asked his idiotic admin friend to ban me. However, another sad issue i wanna address is that u got ppl constantly spawn camping, using glitches to get on roofs and constant TKers getting rarely kicked or even kicked at all. liKE WTH (heck) myte? U got confused admins kicking and banning people. I even had once ppl backing me up, telling admin that his so called "MIC SPAMMING" isn't mic spam at all.

That map is all i play 24/7 so its very sad to me. I even got a lotta ppl who have known me and want me to get back in there.

My request to -EGO- members are to understand the seriousness and consider all the valid points i have stated, and un-recruit those admins and stop recruiting them onwards. And especially tell ur admins to be patient and expand on the several areas where ur rules apply, if ur not posting them on the server. Most of all, DO NOT GIVE THEM PRIVILEGE TO BAAAN!!!

Another side request, yet desiring one smile.gif, is to anoint me an Admin of that server and grant me privilege to reach several other current admins to educate them upon this matter.

AND PLZ DON"T DISRESPECT ME BY IGNORING ME 30 MIN TYPED UP CONCERN.